human-review
petergyang/human-review · Agent Skill
Open HTML, Markdown, or localhost pages in the browser so the user can edit text directly, leave anchored comments, and send all feedback back in one batch.
Jump to install ↓Overview
| Publisher | |
|---|---|
| Repository | petergyang/human-review ↗ |
| Skill folder | src |
| Stars | 1,437 |
| Forks | 125 |
| Bundled files | 19 |
| License | MIT |
| Last updated | September 17, 2026 |
| Links | Skill source ↗ · Repository ↗ |
Mozgi check
What we found in the skill files. Details come with a subscription.
Installation
A skill is a folder with a SKILL.md file. Pick your agent and run the commands in a terminal (macOS, Linux or Git Bash on Windows) from your project root.
Copy the prompt into Claude, Codex or another assistant: it will review the skill and install it for you.
Install the “human-review” skill from mozgi.io (https://mozgi.io/skills/petergyang-human-review/) for me. 1. Download the archive: https://mozgi.io/skills/petergyang-human-review/download If it fails, take the skill folder from the source: https://github.com/petergyang/human-review/tree/main/src 2. Read SKILL.md and the other files. Check the skill is safe: no hidden commands, no sending data elsewhere, no scripts doing something other than described. If anything looks suspicious, stop and tell me. 3. Put the “human-review” folder into your agent's skills folder: .claude/skills/ for Claude Code, .agents/skills/ for Codex, .cursor/skills/ for Cursor, .gemini/skills/ for Gemini CLI. Inside the project if we are in one, otherwise in the home folder (~/.claude/skills/ etc.). 4. Make sure <skills folder>/human-review/SKILL.md exists. 5. Briefly tell me what this skill does and offer to try it on my task. If you cannot do a step yourself, tell me what to click or type.
git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://github.com/petergyang/human-review.git /tmp/human-review mkdir -p .claude/skills cp -r /tmp/human-review/src .claude/skills/src
Restart Claude Code — the skill appears in the list; call it manually with /human-review. For all projects use ~/.claude/skills.
git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://github.com/petergyang/human-review.git /tmp/human-review mkdir -p .agents/skills cp -r /tmp/human-review/src .agents/skills/src
Codex looks for skills in .agents/skills from the current folder up to the repo root; call one with /skills or $human-review. For all projects use ~/.agents/skills.
git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://github.com/petergyang/human-review.git /tmp/human-review mkdir -p .cursor/skills cp -r /tmp/human-review/src .cursor/skills/src
Cursor picks the skill up on start; call it with “/” in Agent chat. Cursor also reads .claude/skills and .agents/skills. For all projects use ~/.cursor/skills.
git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://github.com/petergyang/human-review.git /tmp/human-review mkdir -p .gemini/skills cp -r /tmp/human-review/src .gemini/skills/src
Gemini CLI offers to activate the skill when a task matches — you approve it. For all projects use ~/.gemini/skills.
Read SKILL.md and any companion files before deciding whether to install. Click a file to preview it.
SKILL.md contents
Original author text · read-onlyhuman-review
The user reviews your HTML, Markdown, or localhost page in a real browser: they fix small things
by typing, select anything to comment on it, and send you the whole batch at once.
Markdown files open rendered. Their quotes and edits reference the rendered text,
and the file itself is never touched — apply every change to the Markdown source,
keeping its formatting syntax.
The loop
1. Write or update the HTML or Markdown file, or start the local page being reviewed.
2. Open it for the user:
```sh
npx -y human-review path/to/file.html
```
For a page served by a local development server, open the real route instead
of recreating it as a separate HTML file:
```sh
npx -y human-review http://localhost:3000/wiki
```
3. Wait for feedback. This command blocks until the user hits Send in the
browser, then prints their batch and exits:
```sh
npx -y human-review poll path/to/file.html
```
The command exits only when the user clicks Send or closes the review.
There is nothing to re-run, no interval to poll on, and no --timeout to
add. It survives the local server restarting, and feedback is saved even
if the poll dies, so nothing is ever lost. How you wait depends on your
harness:
- Claude Code: run it with
run_in_background: trueand end your turn.
Claude Code wakes you with the output the moment the command exits.
- Codex, Cursor, and everything else: run it in the foreground,
inside your active turn, and stay on it until it prints feedback or
closed. Do not detach it or start it as a background session: nothing
wakes you when a detached command finishes. While the review is active:
- If the user sends a message, answer it as commentary and immediately
resume the foreground poll in the same turn. Do not send a final
response until the poll returns feedback or closed — a final
response ends the turn and kills the wait.
- If your shell tool caps command duration, pass
--timeouta little
under the cap and run bounded polls back to back in the same active
turn until one returns feedback or closed.
Know the limit: this is reliable only while your turn stays active. A
turn that has already ended is not woken when the user hits Send; the
user has to message you, and you then run status and poll to pick
the batch up. There is no integration that resumes an ended task when
the poll exits.
If it prints {"status":"closed"}, the review is over: the user ended it,
closed the tab, or never had one open (reason says which). Stop and do
not start another poll. unsent counts feedback they left behind; if it is
not zero, tell the user in one line that it is kept and they can restore or
discard it next time. {"status":"superseded"} means a newer poll of
yours owns the wait — stop this one silently. {"status":"timeout"} only
appears after 12 hours; run status and start the wait again if the
review is still open.
4. Apply what comes back, then start the next background poll. --ack clears
the batch you just handled:
```sh
npx -y human-review poll path/to/file.html --ack
```
Repeat 3–4 until the user says they are done.
Not sure whether feedback is already waiting — say, at the start of a new turn
with no poll running? This answers instantly without blocking:
npx -y human-review status path/to/file.html
It prints {"status": "feedback-waiting"} when a batch is ready for a poll,
plus counts of unsent comments and edits still in the browser.
What you get
One batch covers every page the user visited, grouped by file or localhost URL.
{
"status": "feedback",
"pages": [
{
"file": "/abs/path/to/page.html",
"edits_saved": true,
"comments": [
{ "id": "c_1", "kind": "selection", "quote": "the exact text they selected",
"anchor": { "prefix": "...", "quote": "...", "suffix": "..." },
"feedback": "what they want changed" }
],
"edits": [
{ "label": "Problem body", "kind": "edited",
"before": "the original wording",
"after": "their exact new wording",
"after_html": "their exact new wording with <strong>formatting</strong>" }
]
}
],
"overall_note": "feedback not tied to any one page"
}
Rules
editsare changes the user already made.afteris their exact wording —
carry it across verbatim and never revert it. If the HTML was generated from
something else (MDX, Markdown, a template), apply after to the source too,
or their fix disappears on the next build.
edits_saved: truemeans those edits are already in the file on disk.
Plain HTML files autosave as the user types, so your copy of the file is
stale. Re-read the file before touching it and make targeted changes only;
never regenerate it from what you wrote earlier, or their work disappears.
edits_saved: false (Markdown, localhost pages, self-rendering HTML) means the
edits exist only in this batch — apply them to the source yourself.
- An edit with
kind: "deleted"means the user removed that whole block:
delete it from the source too, without asking why.
- An edit marked
truncated: truehad its text cut at 200k characters; read
the block from the page itself rather than from after_html.
- When
before_html/after_htmlare present, the user changed formatting, not
just words — bold, italic, underline, links. Use the HTML version to carry the
formatting into the source, translated to its syntax (e.g. <strong> → **
in Markdown/MDX).
- A page with
kind: "url"was edited directly in the review UI. Itsfile
and url fields name the localhost route, not a writable file. Find the
matching project source (such as MDX, TSX, or a template), apply every edit
and deletion there, then acknowledge so the route reloads. Never write the
rendered HTTP response back into the app.
- When an edit's
after_htmlcontains<img src="assets/...">, the user pasted
an image: the file already exists in an assets/ folder next to the reviewed
file. Keep that relative path — in Markdown, reference it as
. Never regenerate or inline the image.
- On a localhost page, a pasted image arrives under
staged_assets. Copy its
local path into the app's appropriate asset folder, replace the temporary
preview URL in after_html, and preserve the image at the user's insertion
point. Never leave the temporary preview URL in source.
- An edit with
kind: "moved"means the user relocated that whole block.
Reposition it in the source without rewriting its content: it now sits right
after the block whose text starts with moved_after, and right before the
block whose text starts with moved_before (both are clipped to 90
characters and may end in …). An empty moved_after means it is now the
first block in its container.
- Find each comment by its
quote. It is the rendered text the user
selected, so in Markdown or templated HTML it may span formatting syntax or
tags; anchor.prefix and anchor.suffix give the surrounding text to
disambiguate.
kind: "element"points at a whole block, soquoteis its label, not body text.- Copy any
staged_assetsfiles before you ack:--ackdeletes them. - A batch with only an
overall_notehas an emptypagesarray. - Fix every page in
pages, not just the first. - Do not write a reply. There is no chat. The user sees your work when the page
reloads, which happens on its own the moment you save the file.
Better edit labels (optional)
Name the sections you author and the user's edit list uses your names instead of
guessing from the DOM:
<p data-block="Problem body">…</p>
<div data-container="Metrics callout">…</div>
data-block names a region for the edit list. data-container also makes the block
clickable as a comment target.
Frequently asked questions
What does the human-review skill do?
Open HTML, Markdown, or localhost pages in the browser so the user can edit text directly, leave anchored comments, and send all feedback back in one batch.
How do I install human-review?
Open the “Installation” block on this page and pick your agent — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or Gemini CLI — for ready-made commands that copy the skill folder to the right place. Or copy the prompt from the “Via assistant” tab and let the assistant review and install the skill.
Which AI models work with human-review?
Skills are plain Markdown instructions (the Agent Skills format), so human-review works with any agent that reads SKILL.md: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and more. The model loads the instructions only when a task matches the skill's description.
Is human-review free?
The skill is published openly by petergyang under the MIT license. The skill itself costs nothing — you only pay your AI provider for the tokens you use.
Is it safe to install skills?
A skill is a set of instructions your agent will follow, so read SKILL.md and its companion files before installing. Scripts in the skill folder only run if your agent runs them — keep an eye on what it does and do not grant unnecessary permissions.
How is a skill different from an MCP server or a plugin?
An MCP server or plugin gives the model new tools — code that runs and returns a result. A skill gives it knowledge and process: how to approach a task, which steps to follow and what good output looks like. It needs no server or API key.