human-review

petergyang/human-review · Agent Skill

開啟HTML、Markdown或localhost頁面在瀏覽器中,以便使用者可以直接編輯文字,留下固定評論,並一次性傳送所有反饋。

前往安裝 ↓

總覽

發布者petergyang社群
儲存庫petergyang/human-review ↗
技能資料夾src
星1,437
分支125
附帶檔案19
授權MIT
最近更新2026年9月17日
連結技能原始碼 ↗ · 儲存庫 ↗

Mozgi 檢查

我們在技能檔案中發現的內容。詳細資訊需訂閱。

安全性
中等風險 · 發現 1 個需要注意的地方
相容性
需要額外軟體
相似技能
找到 62 個相似技能
訂閱另含

安裝

技能就是一個含 SKILL.md 的資料夾。選擇你的代理,在專案根目錄的終端機(macOS、Linux 或 Windows 的 Git Bash)執行指令。

把提示貼到 Claude、Codex 或其他助理:它會自行檢查並安裝技能。

Install the “human-review” skill from mozgi.io (https://mozgi.io/skills/petergyang-human-review/) for me.

1. Download the archive: https://mozgi.io/skills/petergyang-human-review/download
   If it fails, take the skill folder from the source: https://github.com/petergyang/human-review/tree/main/src
2. Read SKILL.md and the other files. Check the skill is safe: no hidden commands, no sending data elsewhere, no scripts doing something other than described. If anything looks suspicious, stop and tell me.
3. Put the “human-review” folder into your agent's skills folder: .claude/skills/ for Claude Code, .agents/skills/ for Codex, .cursor/skills/ for Cursor, .gemini/skills/ for Gemini CLI. Inside the project if we are in one, otherwise in the home folder (~/.claude/skills/ etc.).
4. Make sure <skills folder>/human-review/SKILL.md exists.
5. Briefly tell me what this skill does and offer to try it on my task.

If you cannot do a step yourself, tell me what to click or type.

技能檔案

19 個檔案 下載 ZIP

安裝前請先檢視 SKILL.md 與相關檔案。點擊檔案即可預覽。

SKILL.md 內容

作者原文 · 唯讀

human-review

The user reviews your HTML, Markdown, or localhost page in a real browser: they fix small things

by typing, select anything to comment on it, and send you the whole batch at once.

Markdown files open rendered. Their quotes and edits reference the rendered text,

and the file itself is never touched — apply every change to the Markdown source,

keeping its formatting syntax.

The loop

1. Write or update the HTML or Markdown file, or start the local page being reviewed.

2. Open it for the user:

```sh

npx -y human-review path/to/file.html

```

For a page served by a local development server, open the real route instead

of recreating it as a separate HTML file:

```sh

npx -y human-review http://localhost:3000/wiki

```

3. Wait for feedback. This command blocks until the user hits Send in the

browser, then prints their batch and exits:

```sh

npx -y human-review poll path/to/file.html

```

The command exits only when the user clicks Send or closes the review.

There is nothing to re-run, no interval to poll on, and no --timeout to

add. It survives the local server restarting, and feedback is saved even

if the poll dies, so nothing is ever lost. How you wait depends on your

harness:

  • Claude Code: run it with run_in_background: true and end your turn.

Claude Code wakes you with the output the moment the command exits.

  • Codex, Cursor, and everything else: run it in the foreground,

inside your active turn, and stay on it until it prints feedback or

closed. Do not detach it or start it as a background session: nothing

wakes you when a detached command finishes. While the review is active:

  • If the user sends a message, answer it as commentary and immediately

resume the foreground poll in the same turn. Do not send a final

response until the poll returns feedback or closed — a final

response ends the turn and kills the wait.

  • If your shell tool caps command duration, pass --timeout a little

under the cap and run bounded polls back to back in the same active

turn until one returns feedback or closed.

Know the limit: this is reliable only while your turn stays active. A

turn that has already ended is not woken when the user hits Send; the

user has to message you, and you then run status and poll to pick

the batch up. There is no integration that resumes an ended task when

the poll exits.

If it prints {"status":"closed"}, the review is over: the user ended it,

closed the tab, or never had one open (reason says which). Stop and do

not start another poll. unsent counts feedback they left behind; if it is

not zero, tell the user in one line that it is kept and they can restore or

discard it next time. {"status":"superseded"} means a newer poll of

yours owns the wait — stop this one silently. {"status":"timeout"} only

appears after 12 hours; run status and start the wait again if the

review is still open.

4. Apply what comes back, then start the next background poll. --ack clears

the batch you just handled:

```sh

npx -y human-review poll path/to/file.html --ack

```

Repeat 3–4 until the user says they are done.

Not sure whether feedback is already waiting — say, at the start of a new turn

with no poll running? This answers instantly without blocking:

npx -y human-review status path/to/file.html

It prints {"status": "feedback-waiting"} when a batch is ready for a poll,

plus counts of unsent comments and edits still in the browser.

What you get

One batch covers every page the user visited, grouped by file or localhost URL.

{
  "status": "feedback",
  "pages": [
    {
      "file": "/abs/path/to/page.html",
      "edits_saved": true,
      "comments": [
        { "id": "c_1", "kind": "selection", "quote": "the exact text they selected",
          "anchor": { "prefix": "...", "quote": "...", "suffix": "..." },
          "feedback": "what they want changed" }
      ],
      "edits": [
        { "label": "Problem body", "kind": "edited",
          "before": "the original wording",
          "after": "their exact new wording",
          "after_html": "their exact new wording with <strong>formatting</strong>" }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "overall_note": "feedback not tied to any one page"
}

Rules

  • edits are changes the user already made. after is their exact wording —

carry it across verbatim and never revert it. If the HTML was generated from

something else (MDX, Markdown, a template), apply after to the source too,

or their fix disappears on the next build.

  • edits_saved: true means those edits are already in the file on disk.

Plain HTML files autosave as the user types, so your copy of the file is

stale. Re-read the file before touching it and make targeted changes only;

never regenerate it from what you wrote earlier, or their work disappears.

edits_saved: false (Markdown, localhost pages, self-rendering HTML) means the

edits exist only in this batch — apply them to the source yourself.

  • An edit with kind: "deleted" means the user removed that whole block:

delete it from the source too, without asking why.

  • An edit marked truncated: true had its text cut at 200k characters; read

the block from the page itself rather than from after_html.

  • When before_html/after_html are present, the user changed formatting, not

just words — bold, italic, underline, links. Use the HTML version to carry the

formatting into the source, translated to its syntax (e.g. <strong> → **

in Markdown/MDX).

  • A page with kind: "url" was edited directly in the review UI. Its file

and url fields name the localhost route, not a writable file. Find the

matching project source (such as MDX, TSX, or a template), apply every edit

and deletion there, then acknowledge so the route reloads. Never write the

rendered HTTP response back into the app.

  • When an edit's after_html contains <img src="assets/...">, the user pasted

an image: the file already exists in an assets/ folder next to the reviewed

file. Keep that relative path — in Markdown, reference it as

![](assets/...). Never regenerate or inline the image.

  • On a localhost page, a pasted image arrives under staged_assets. Copy its

local path into the app's appropriate asset folder, replace the temporary

preview URL in after_html, and preserve the image at the user's insertion

point. Never leave the temporary preview URL in source.

  • An edit with kind: "moved" means the user relocated that whole block.

Reposition it in the source without rewriting its content: it now sits right

after the block whose text starts with moved_after, and right before the

block whose text starts with moved_before (both are clipped to 90

characters and may end in …). An empty moved_after means it is now the

first block in its container.

  • Find each comment by its quote. It is the rendered text the user

selected, so in Markdown or templated HTML it may span formatting syntax or

tags; anchor.prefix and anchor.suffix give the surrounding text to

disambiguate.

  • kind: "element" points at a whole block, so quote is its label, not body text.
  • Copy any staged_assets files before you ack: --ack deletes them.
  • A batch with only an overall_note has an empty pages array.
  • Fix every page in pages, not just the first.
  • Do not write a reply. There is no chat. The user sees your work when the page

reloads, which happens on its own the moment you save the file.

Better edit labels (optional)

Name the sections you author and the user's edit list uses your names instead of

guessing from the DOM:

<p data-block="Problem body">…</p>
<div data-container="Metrics callout">…</div>

data-block names a region for the edit list. data-container also makes the block

clickable as a comment target.

常見問題

human-review 技能有什麼用途?

開啟HTML、Markdown或localhost頁面在瀏覽器中,以便使用者可以直接編輯文字,留下固定評論,並一次性傳送所有反饋。

如何安裝 human-review?

打開本頁的「安裝」區塊並選擇你的代理 — Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 或 Gemini CLI:那裡有把技能資料夾複製到正確位置的現成指令。也可以複製「透過助理」分頁中的提示,讓助理自行檢查並安裝技能。

human-review 適用哪些 AI 模型?

技能是純 Markdown 指示(Agent Skills 格式),因此 human-review 適用任何讀取 SKILL.md 的代理:Claude Code、Codex、Cursor、Gemini CLI、GitHub Copilot、OpenCode 等。只有在任務符合技能描述時,模型才會載入指示。

human-review 是免費的嗎?

此技能由 petergyang 公開發布,採用 MIT 授權。技能本身免費 — 你只需向 AI 供應商支付實際使用的 token 費用。

安裝技能安全嗎?

技能是代理會遵循的指示,安裝前請閱讀 SKILL.md 及相關檔案。技能資料夾中的腳本只有在代理執行時才會運行 — 留意它的動作,不要授予多餘權限。

技能和 MCP 伺服器或外掛有何不同?

MCP 伺服器或外掛為模型提供新工具 — 會執行並回傳結果的程式碼。技能提供的是知識與流程:如何處理任務、要遵循哪些步驟、好的成果長什麼樣子。它不需要伺服器或 API 金鑰。

相關技能

所有技能 →