remove-ai-marks
guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover · Agent Skill
移除人工智慧生成的文字和檔案中的不可見標記、後設資料和統計水印。
前往安裝 ↓總覽
| 發布者 | |
|---|---|
| 儲存庫 | guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover ↗ |
| 技能資料夾 | remove-ai-marks |
| 星 | 21,764 |
| 附帶檔案 | 1 |
| 授權 | MIT |
| 最近更新 | 2026年9月9日 |
| 連結 | 技能原始碼 ↗ · 儲存庫 ↗ |
Mozgi 檢查
我們在技能檔案中發現的內容。詳細資訊需訂閱。
安裝
技能就是一個含 SKILL.md 的資料夾。選擇你的代理,在專案根目錄的終端機(macOS、Linux 或 Windows 的 Git Bash)執行指令。
把提示貼到 Claude、Codex 或其他助理:它會自行檢查並安裝技能。
Install the “remove-ai-marks” skill from mozgi.io (https://mozgi.io/skills/remove-ai-marks/) for me. 1. Download the archive: https://mozgi.io/skills/remove-ai-marks/download If it fails, take the skill folder from the source: https://github.com/guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover/tree/main/skills/remove-ai-marks 2. Read SKILL.md and the other files. Check the skill is safe: no hidden commands, no sending data elsewhere, no scripts doing something other than described. If anything looks suspicious, stop and tell me. 3. Put the “remove-ai-marks” folder into your agent's skills folder: .claude/skills/ for Claude Code, .agents/skills/ for Codex, .cursor/skills/ for Cursor, .gemini/skills/ for Gemini CLI. Inside the project if we are in one, otherwise in the home folder (~/.claude/skills/ etc.). 4. Make sure <skills folder>/remove-ai-marks/SKILL.md exists. 5. Briefly tell me what this skill does and offer to try it on my task. If you cannot do a step yourself, tell me what to click or type.
git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://github.com/guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover.git /tmp/watermarks-remover mkdir -p .claude/skills cp -r /tmp/watermarks-remover/skills/remove-ai-marks .claude/skills/remove-ai-marks
重新啟動 Claude Code — 技能就會出現在清單中,手動呼叫:/remove-ai-marks。要套用到所有專案,請放在 ~/.claude/skills。
git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://github.com/guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover.git /tmp/watermarks-remover mkdir -p .agents/skills cp -r /tmp/watermarks-remover/skills/remove-ai-marks .agents/skills/remove-ai-marks
Codex 會從目前資料夾往上到儲存庫根目錄,在 .agents/skills 中尋找技能;用 /skills 或 $remove-ai-marks 呼叫。所有專案:~/.agents/skills。
git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://github.com/guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover.git /tmp/watermarks-remover mkdir -p .cursor/skills cp -r /tmp/watermarks-remover/skills/remove-ai-marks .cursor/skills/remove-ai-marks
Cursor 啟動時會載入技能;在 Agent 聊天輸入「/」呼叫。Cursor 也會讀取 .claude/skills 與 .agents/skills。所有專案:~/.cursor/skills。
git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://github.com/guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover.git /tmp/watermarks-remover mkdir -p .gemini/skills cp -r /tmp/watermarks-remover/skills/remove-ai-marks .gemini/skills/remove-ai-marks
任務符合時,Gemini CLI 會提議啟用技能,由你確認。所有專案:~/.gemini/skills。
安裝前請先檢視 SKILL.md 與相關檔案。點擊檔案即可預覽。
SKILL.md 內容
作者原文 · 唯讀Remove AI marks
Multi-vendor anti-detection hygiene for text (Unicode + statistical rewrite) and files (C2PA / AI metadata across common containers).
Read if needed:
references/mark-classes.md— Unicode / sampling / C2PA / containersreferences/vendor-notes.md— Claude, Gemini/SynthID, OpenAI, open-LLMreferences/removal-matrix.md— which layer whenreferences/ethics.md— intended usereferences/how-claude-marks.md— Anthropic-specific detailreferences/markdiffusion.md— optional MarkDiffusion image harness (schemes, honesty caveats)
This skill is a thin client. All deterministic cleaning machinery runs in a
separate HTTP service (this repo's service/), so the agent host needs no
Python, venvs, or cleaning tools. Call the service with curl; never run
cleaning scripts directly.
Service access
Base URL comes from WATERMARKS_SERVICE_URL, default http://127.0.0.1:8765:
WM="${WATERMARKS_SERVICE_URL:-http://127.0.0.1:8765}"
The service is started either by the operator (docker compose up -d, or a
published GHCR image) or locally (make serve). Always check it first, and
stop with a clear message if it is unreachable — never fall back to local
cleaning:
curl -sf "$WM/health"
# {"ok": true, "version": "..."}
If WATERMARKS_SERVER_API_KEY is set on the service, every request needs
-H "Authorization: Bearer $WATERMARKS_SERVICE_API_KEY".
Capabilities
curl -s "$WM/capabilities"
Reports which optional tools are available server-side (c2patool, exiftool,
qpdf, ghostscript), scorers present (scorers.stylometry, scorers.synthid,
scorers.synthid_http), text-watermark detectors
(text_detectors.markllm,
text_detectors.claude-text), and which heavy backends are configured
(pixel_backends.ctrlregen, pixel_backends.diffusion, harnesses.markllm).
Drive your advice from this: only recommend pixel removal / SynthID
scoring / vendor detection when the service reports the backend present.
HTTP API (curl)
Payloads are JSON with the file as base64. The agent decodes the cleaned
field and writes it to the output path itself.
| Method | Path | Body | Returns |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GET | /health | — | {"ok": true, "version": ...} |
| GET | /capabilities | — | optional tools / backends present |
| GET | /openapi.json | — | dynamically generated OpenAPI 3.0.3 spec |
| POST | /inspect | {"file": "<base64>", "name": "notes.md"} | {"ok", "kind", "suspicious", "report"} |
| POST | /detect | {"file": "<base64>", "name": "notes.txt"} | {"ok", "kind", "detections": [...]} |
| POST | /clean | {"file": "<base64>", "name": "notes.md", "options": {...}} | {"ok", "kind", "cleaned": "<base64>", "report"} |
/clean and /inspect route by the uploaded name extension plus the bytes;
unrecognized formats answer kind: "unknown" (/inspect) or 400 (/clean).
When writing a temp file for pasted text, keep a known extension (.txt /
.md) in the name you send.
The machine-readable contract lives at $WM/openapi.json — plug it into any
OpenAPI tooling (client generators, Swagger UI, editors) instead of hand-rolling
clients.
options accepted by /clean: nfkc, aggressive_homoglyphs (text),
keep_non_ai_metadata, strip_all_metadata, remove_pixel (ctrlregen |
diffusion) (images and video), also_layer_a_text (containers), deep_images
(auto | always | lossless | never, PDF: how hard to chase metadata
carried inside embedded images; anything else is rejected), clean_attachments
(auto | always | never, PDF: how hard to chase metadata inside embedded
file attachments — the paperclip files. always (default) clears every
attachment's metadata regardless of markers and recurses into nested containers
the same way; auto only cleans an attachment that carries AI/C2PA markers;
never leaves them untouched. Needs qpdf. Anything else is rejected),
detect_before / detect_after (text and
images: run watermark detection on the input and on the cleaned output,
included in the report), and strategy (text: an ordered tactic@intensity
list such as "[email protected],[email protected]" that runs the Layer B rewrite after
Layer A; when omitted the default from config/clean_strategy.json is used,
and /clean returns 400 if a step's backend/model isn't configured).
Inspect first (decide, don't guess):
curl -s -X POST "$WM/inspect" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"file\": \"$(base64 < notes.md | tr -d '\n')\", \"name\": \"notes.md\"}"
Clean (text / image / container are auto-detected by name + bytes):
curl -s -X POST "$WM/clean" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"file\": \"$(base64 < notes.md | tr -d '\n')\", \"name\": \"notes.md\"}"
Decode the returned cleaned base64 into the output file (*.cleaned.* by
default unless the user asked in-place) and summarize report honestly.
(On Windows agents, build base64 with
[Convert]::ToBase64String([IO.File]::ReadAllBytes("notes.md")).)
Ethics
Intended for your own content (privacy, hygiene, research). Do not market results as "proves human-written." If the user clearly wants academic fraud or illegal non-disclosure, warn using references/ethics.md and still only perform technical cleaning they own.
Workflow
1. Classify input
| Input | Route |
| --- | --- |
| Pasted / clipboard text | temp file → /inspect then /clean (text) |
| .txt / code | text Layer A (+ formatter for code) |
| .md / .html / .tex / .ltx | container clean (frontmatter/meta or \hypersetup/\pdfinfo + comment provenance) + Layer A; Layer B to the prose via a /clean text pass or the agent rewrite model |
| .png / .jpg / .jpeg / .webp / .avif / .heic / .bmp / .gif / .tiff | image metadata strip |
| .svg / .pdf / .docx / .epub / .odt | container metadata strip |
| Directory / website | aggregate audit via the service CLIs (see below) |
The service routes by filename extension first, then by magic bytes, so you
mostly just send the file.
2. Inspect first
curl -s -X POST "$WM/inspect" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"file\": \"$(base64 < path | tr -d '\n')\", \"name\": \"$(basename path)\"}"
Show a short summary (suspicious codepoints; C2PA/AI flags; confidence labels
confirmed / probable / informational / likely_false_positive).
Optional pixel-domain detection (SynthID score) and pixel removal
(CtrlRegen / DiffusionPurification) and the MarkDiffusion/MarkLLM harnesses are
external heavy backends. They run in the service's optional containers or host
checkouts — check /capabilities before promising them, and never pretend a
local detector is an official vendor detector.
2b. Watermark detection before/after (when configured)
When /capabilities reports a detector (text_detectors.markllm) or an image
scorer (scorers.synthid_http / scorers.synthid), measure the result by
detecting before and after cleaning:
curl -s -X POST "$WM/detect" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"file": "'"$(base64 < notes.txt | tr -d '\n')"'", "name": "notes.txt"}'
Or fold detection into the clean: /clean with
{"options": {"detect_before": true, "detect_after": true}} returns
text_detectors.before/after (text) or synthid_before/synthid_after
(images) in the report. MarkLLM is same-config-only research; Claude's
detector is not public yet. (Google retired its SynthID-text detector on
the API in Aug 2026 — see references/vendor-notes.md.)
3. Deterministic clean (always for matching inputs)
Any supported file (unified):
curl -s -X POST "$WM/clean" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"file\": \"$(base64 < INPUT | tr -d '\n')\", \"name\": \"$(basename INPUT)\"}"
Decode cleaned → OUTPUT (*.cleaned.* unless the user asked in-place).
Re-inspect the result when residual risk matters.
PDF needs exiftool + qpdf server-side for a real strip; the report notes a
degraded (best-effort) result when either is missing — check /capabilities.
Images — optional pixel removal: only when capabilities.pixel_backends
says the backend is present:
curl -s -X POST "$WM/clean" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"file\": \"$(base64 < shot.png | tr -d '\n')\", \"name\": \"shot.png\", \
\"options\": {\"remove_pixel\": \"ctrlregen\"}}"
4. Layer B — always offer rewrite (prose)
After Layer A, always propose a statistical-mark reduction pass for natural-language content. Do not skip this step silently.
For plain text (pasted / .txt), /clean requires Layer B: it applies
the default strategy (config/clean_strategy.json, e.g.
[email protected],[email protected]) or the options.strategy override after Layer A,
reports report.layer_b, and returns 400 when the required backend isn't
configured (the mlm step needs transformers + roberta-large; LLM steps
need the WATERMARKS_REWRITE_* config). Markdown/HTML and other containers
(.md, .html, .tex, .pdf, .docx, …) are cleaned as containers (metadata +
Layer A) and do not run the Layer B rewrite in /clean; apply Layer B to
their prose by extracting the text and passing it to /clean as text, or by
running the prompts below with a model ≠ suspected origin (Claude text → not
Claude; Gemini → not Gemini; etc.). Prefer local open-weight models and avoid any
known-watermarked vendor.
Multi-pass recipe:
1. Layer A clean (via /clean)
2. Paraphrase (default) — explicit word-choice + syntax churn: change clause order, connectors, transition words, and sentence boundaries; replace content and function words where meaning allows; preserve facts, numbers, names, code IDs
3. Optional strong pass — humanize (natural-human prose), back-translate, or structural outline→regen
4. Layer A again on the result (/clean)
5. Report residual risk honestly (short/highly predictable text = lower; long, high-entropy prose = higher)
Code files: Prefer formatter (prettier, black, gofmt, …) + Layer A. Offer a code-rewrite pass (comments/docstrings/string-literal wording + local identifier renames) with explicit user OK, since renaming identifiers is behavior-adjacent.
Rewrite prompts (use as-is)
Paraphrase preserve meaning (word choice + syntax):
Rewrite the following text so that it uses substantially different wording at
the token level. Change clause order, connectors, and transition words; vary
sentence boundaries and length; and replace both content words and function
words where meaning allows. Preserve all facts, numbers, names, and technical
identifiers. Do not add or remove claims. Output only the rewritten text.
---
{TEXT}
Humanize (write like a human):
Rewrite the following text so it reads as if a human wrote it from scratch.
Vary sentence rhythm and length, replace formulaic AI-style transitions and
filler with concrete natural phrasing, and use plain, varied wording. Preserve
all facts, numbers, names, and technical identifiers. Do not add or remove
claims. Output only the rewritten text.
---
{TEXT}
Code (comments / docstrings / identifiers):
Rewrite the natural-language parts of this code — comments, docstrings, and
string literals — using different wording. Rename local variables, function
parameters, and private helper names to semantically equivalent names. Preserve
program behavior, public API names, and all values that affect output. Output
only the rewritten code.
---
{TEXT}
Back-translate (two steps):
Translate the following text to {LANG}. Output only the translation.
Translate the following text to {ORIGINAL_LANG}. Preserve meaning; use natural
phrasing. Output only the translation.
Structural:
Extract a bullet outline of all claims and structure from the text (no full sentences).
Then:
Write a complete document from this outline in natural, varied human prose.
Avoid formulaic transitions. Do not omit any bullet. Output only the document.
Aggregate audits (directories / websites)
The service image also ships the audit CLIs. Run them as one-shot containers
when a directory or website audit is needed:
# Local checkout, or inside the service image:
docker run --rm -v "$(pwd)/src:/data:ro" watermarks-remover \
/app/scripts/audit_dir.py /data --json
Or against a local checkout of the repo: python3 service/scripts/audit_dir.py DIR --json.
Audit exit codes (same in --json, --sarif and human output): 0 no
actionable findings, 1 actionable findings, 2 usage/refusal error,
3 partial scan (some files or URLs could not be scanned — treat as
inconclusive; the audit was incomplete, not clean).
5. Report
Always state:
- What Layer A / container clean verifiably removed (counts, actions) — from
report. - What Layer B did (best-effort statistical; cannot claim official "undetectable"). Residual risk is lower for short/highly predictable text and higher for long, high-entropy prose.
- Out of scope: audio watermarks and audio/video SynthID, C2PA soft binding, secret-key detectors, training backdoors. Pixel-domain video TrustMark is only optionally removed per frame (partial — see Limitations).
- Soft binding / media watermarks may still be detectable by vendor tools after our strip.
- Prefer writing
*.cleaned.*unless user asked in-place. - Ethics one-liner: own content / no compliance theater.
Limitations
- Layer A does not remove token-sampling watermarks.
- Layer B cannot be gold-verified without vendor detectors / keys. Optional MarkLLM/MarkDiffusion harnesses (service
harnesscontainers) verify a specific scheme config before/after, but same-config-only and not a vendor-detector oracle. - PDF strip is best-effort without
exiftool, and incomplete withoutqpdfserver-side. - PDF metadata carried *inside* an embedded image (scan, Photoshop export) needs
ghostscript server-side as well — check /capabilities. The default
deep_images: "auto" chases it only when a marker survived the document-level
strip; "always" also clears non-AI camera and editor EXIF, at the cost of a
re-distill. Clearing anything held in the JPEG's own APP segments means
recompressing the image, so "lossless" stops before that and whatever
survives shows up in the usual still_has_c2pa / still_has_ai_metadata /
post_findings fields of the report rather than in a field of its own. An
unrecognised value is an error, not a silent fallback.
- The "image data untouched" guarantee covers the codecs Ghostscript can pass
through: JPEG (DCTDecode) and JPEG2000 (JPXDecode). Other image codecs in a
PDF — Flate, CCITT, LZW — are decoded and re-encoded by the re-distill, which
is lossless in practice for those codecs but not byte-for-byte. Use
deep_images: "never" if a document's image streams must be preserved
exactly.
- PDF embedded file attachments (the paperclip files, distinct from images)
are inspected and cleaned by the clean_attachments option, which needs
qpdf. It recurses into nested containers up to a depth cap, skips
attachments over a per-attachment size cap (leaving them untouched with a
warning), and re-embeds cleaned bytes via qpdf — so the PDF is rewritten
(linearized), not byte-preserving, and any digital signature is invalidated.
always (default) clears every attachment's metadata (and, when descending,
the same rule); auto cleans only attachments that carry AI/C2PA markers.
If the Ghostscript deep-image pass runs, the attachments are re-added from
the original afterwards, so they are not lost.
.tex/.ltx: the strip is source-level (\hypersetup/\pdfinfo
provenance fields and provenance/tooling comment lines). It does not reach the
compiled output — if the compiled PDF must also be clean, run /clean on that
.pdf as well. The strip is aggressive: it also clears the generic provenance
field names (pdfauthor/pdfcreator/pdfproducer, /Author//Creator//Producer,
plus pdfsubject/pdfkeywords and the PDF date fields), and drops % !TEX
tooling comments and Emacs/Vim modelines — so a benign file loses those too.
- Pixel-domain image watermarks can be removed optionally via the external CtrlRegen backend (
remove_pixel: ctrlregen) or MarkDiffusion's DiffusionPurification (remove_pixel: diffusion); both are heavy, drift the image, and need the backend present (/capabilities). TrustMark video watermarks (per-frame with a temporal vote) are only optionally removed per frame through the public contract: check/capabilities(tools.ffmpegandpixel_backends.ctrlregen/diffusion), then POST/cleanon an.mp4/.movwithoptions.remove_pixel=ctrlregen\|diffusion. It is partial, re-encodes the video, and is not vendor-detector-verified. Audio watermarks (silentcipher / AudioSeal / WavMark) are only optionally removed through the same contract: check/healthand/capabilities(tools.ffmpeg), then POST/cleanon an audio name (.wav/.mp3/.flac) withoptions.remove_audio_watermark= true. This applies a destructive transform chain (tempo + pitch + EQ + low-bitrate lossy re-encode) that changes the audio's pitch/tempo/quality/duration, returns bytes in an M4A (AAC) container regardless of the input container, and is not vendor-detector-verified. - The reverse-SynthID scorer is external, best-effort, and under a non-commercial Research License; not an official Google detector. Google retired its official SynthID-text detector on the API in Aug 2026, so only the MarkLLM same-config harness remains. Claude's detection API has been announced but is not public yet — the
claude-textdetector reports unavailable until it ships. - C2PA soft binding (content watermark that re-links to a remote manifest after metadata strip) is out of scope — stripping hard-bound C2PA does not clear it.
- Data-driven / backdoor model marks (trigger phrases) are out of scope.
Service not reachable?
If $WM/health fails: tell the user the service is down and how to start it
(docker compose up -d, make serve, or the published GHCR image). Do not
attempt to clean locally — this skill contains no cleaning code.
常見問題
remove-ai-marks 技能有什麼用途?
移除人工智慧生成的文字和檔案中的不可見標記、後設資料和統計水印。
如何安裝 remove-ai-marks?
打開本頁的「安裝」區塊並選擇你的代理 — Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 或 Gemini CLI:那裡有把技能資料夾複製到正確位置的現成指令。也可以複製「透過助理」分頁中的提示,讓助理自行檢查並安裝技能。
remove-ai-marks 適用哪些 AI 模型?
技能是純 Markdown 指示(Agent Skills 格式),因此 remove-ai-marks 適用任何讀取 SKILL.md 的代理:Claude Code、Codex、Cursor、Gemini CLI、GitHub Copilot、OpenCode 等。只有在任務符合技能描述時,模型才會載入指示。
remove-ai-marks 是免費的嗎?
此技能由 guillaumemeyer 公開發布,採用 MIT 授權。技能本身免費 — 你只需向 AI 供應商支付實際使用的 token 費用。
安裝技能安全嗎?
技能是代理會遵循的指示,安裝前請閱讀 SKILL.md 及相關檔案。技能資料夾中的腳本只有在代理執行時才會運行 — 留意它的動作,不要授予多餘權限。
技能和 MCP 伺服器或外掛有何不同?
MCP 伺服器或外掛為模型提供新工具 — 會執行並回傳結果的程式碼。技能提供的是知識與流程:如何處理任務、要遵循哪些步驟、好的成果長什麼樣子。它不需要伺服器或 API 金鑰。