關於燈塔「Carrow Skerry, 1931」的互動式像素藝術遊戲，可在瀏覽器中遊玩

提示詞

Opus 5.5 一次就完成了整個像素藝術遊戲。對了，提示詞呢？只有短短三句話。我給了 claude 充分的創作自由，讓它想做什麼遊戲就做什麼，結果哇，它真的做得超棒

這個模型的能力真的誇張到不可思議。我給 GPT Sol-6 相同的提示詞，結果卻差得令人震驚。看來這次是 Sol-6 接替了 Opus 5 的位置。

模型變得這麼厲害之後，我開始很難理解現在還有什麼必要購買遊戲。如果只要一個提示詞，就能建立任何你想要的遊戲，還有精美的美術、故事等等——那花 $60+ 到底有什麼意義？

哈哈，當然是因為人類擁有的故事和想法，仍然比這些模型目前能做出的任何東西好得多。不過，遊戲產業肯定會因此受到震撼——很期待看看最後會產生什麼！

總之，這裡是兩個輸出的並排比較，大家有什麼想法？

如果你想自己玩玩看：
https://skerry-light.vercel.app/

左邊是 Claude，右邊是 Opus

Opus 5.5 just one-shot this entire pixel-art game. Oh, and the prompt? It was barely three sentences. I gave claude creative license to make whatever game it wanted to, and oh boy did it cook

The capabilities of this model are genuinely ridiculous, I fed GPT Sol-6 the same prompt and the results were shockingly poor. Seems like Sol-6 is taking the Opus 5 role this time around.

With models becoming this good, I'm struggling to see the need to purchase games anymore. If you can have any game you want created in a single prompt, with beautiful art, story, etc - what's the point of sinking $60+? 

Lol, obviously because the stories and ideas that humans have are still way better than whatever these models can still do. However, the gaming industry is definitely going to be shaken now - excited to see what's gonna come out of this!

Anyway, here's a side by side comparison of both outputs, thoughts?

Also if you wanted to play it yourself:
https://skerry-light.vercel.app/

Left is Claude, right is Opus